Tuesday, December 2, 2014

On The Abrahamic Faiths: Part II, Christianity II of II

 

Orthodox Christianity


Origin: Constantinople
#Emperor trumps Pope#Pope trumps Emperor#I think we should see other people

 

II EASTERN ORTHODOX CHRISTIANITY (A.D. 1053 to Present)

                The Eastern Orthodox Church is listed as having its beginning in A.D. 1053, in truth; it began with Christ’s ministry, but at the time was considered the Catholic Church.  As the Church in Rome became allied with western powers, the Eastern Roman Empire remained, and the church, in accordance with Constantine’s design, defaulted to the authority of the Emperor and God rather than to the Pope.  The Eastern Roman Empire is referred to by modern historians as Byzantium.  Byzantium, at its peak, controlled most of the civilized world, and thus it had many denominations of “Orthodox” Christians: Ethiopian Orthodox, Greek Orthodox, Russ Orthodox, and etc.  With the exception of the Russ, which were converted later, these Christian communities were the same ones being ministered to by Christ, His disciples, and the apostles.
                The date A.D. 1053 is the date given for what has been daubed the “Great Schism”, which marked the informal separation between the Eastern and Western Christian movements.  The separation was largely due to the pettiness and pride of a few influential Bishops on both sides.  Unfortunately the two sides effectively excommunicated one another. The formal divorce, if you will, didn’t occur until nearly 60 years prior to the Protestant Reformation. 


*Excommunication is an extreme form of penance, forbidding the excomunicae from partaking in the Eucharist, not banishment from church or Heaven, though if penance was not done in life it would still need to be completed in death/purgatory.  Excommunication is used typically on all non-Catholics/Orthodox members; Protestants (remain excommunicated today) and are “officially” forbidden to take part in the Eucharist, but Orthodox Christians may celebrate the Eucharist and Mass with Catholics within their own churches, it’s not a reunification but it’s certainly an exciting step in the right direction. 
                Orthodox Christians are very similar to their Catholic brothers.  They share the same basic hierarchical structure and dogmatic beliefs with few exceptions:



1.       Icons are believed to not only aid as a focal point for veneration but as a direct link to the saint or event that they represent.  They are not Idols, as they remain powerless in and of themselves, and are used only as tools for prayer to God, with whom they may intercede on your behalf.  The understanding of Icons is similar to the Roman Catholic veneration of saints, but has proved a major point of contention in the past, as it had been mistaken for idolatry.
2.       Papal authority, simply put, the EOC believes that God is head of the Church(Now that there is no Roman Emperor); arch Bishops, righteous as they may be, remain flawed stewards.
3.       Eternal Church is the simplest way I can think to explain the Orthodox view of the afterlife.  While they believe in Heaven and Hell, they believe that when a Christian dies they may still attend church. Though unseen by mortal eyes, they may still worship and benefit from prayer, as well as pray for others, just as the Saints in the Roman Catholic Church do.
Though there are canonized saints, the EOC teach that all of the faithful are “saints” and should be asked to intercede in prayer, just as one would ask the living.  (Contrary to my Protestant upbringing, my interpretation of scripture puts me more in line with this understanding of the afterlife.)

The EOC did not play a large part in post renaissance Christian history as nearly all of its adherents were destroyed by Islamic forces in the 15th Century.  The Russian remnant was nearly obliterated by Joseph Stalin’s Atheist regime in the mid-20th century but has since experienced resurgence as a symbol of Russian Nationalism.  The Greek Orthodox Church has also seen resurgence since they shook the bonds of their Turkish overlords just prior to WWI. *Interesting historical note: Though battered and destitute, the Greeks joined the Allies against the Central Powers to completely defeat the (Turkish) Ottoman Empire in WWI.  Orthodox Christianity, though larger than it was 50 years ago, is easily the smallest branch of Christianity. 

 

 

 

Protestantism

Origin: The Bible#Luther#Tyndale, “Grace Alone”

III PROTESTANTISM

                Protestantism is the general term given to all Non-Catholic, Non-Orthodox Christians.  If you aren’t Catholic or Orthodox, but consider yourself Christian you are a Protestant.  Protestantism began in 1517 when Martin Luther posted his grievances on the church doors (the social media outlet of the day) as previously mentioned,  Luther’s theology is best summed up by the phrase: “God is all you need” or “Grace alone”.  Scripture and a personal relationship with God allow us to enter into Heaven. No church or human representative of God can neither save nor damn you.   

Protestant denominations are like ice cream: they come in many different flavors but are made the same way, from the same core ingredients.   That being said.....
 


Protestants really branched off, shortly after Luther settled down in relative peace.  I cannot adequately explain the Protestant Reformation in this blog, as the subject has filled volumes. I’ll mention a few names and highlights as best I can, but this is an oversimplified narrative at best (The same could be said for this entire blog!).  

                Luther never sought to start a new movement and had no desire lead, let alone attempt to structure, the movement that he inadvertently began.  Luther had hoped to reform the Catholic Church, not start his own church.  The quickly after Luther and others like him, began to translate and circulate Bibles in common speech, new churches sprouted like wild flowers.  These movements were all fairly similar, relying on God and reason to interpret scripture.  The Catholic Church strongly opposed such actions, and for good reason!  People are flawed, with a selfish nature, thus the power of God's word is dangerous in the wrong hands.  The idea was: If people are able to interpret scripture, there will surely be those that interpret scripture for their own gain. *a power the Catholics had until that time, monopolized...

Though conflict erupted over the sudden upset to papal authority, Germany, Switzerland and the Netherlands after much tragedy, eventually managed to achieve some semblance of peace between Catholic and Protestant adherents.  Many powers took advantage of the opportunity presented by religious passions, and a massive war ensued, lasting for some 30 years.  France, under the infamous Cardinal Richelieu, endeavored to balance powers, and actually supported both sides of the conflict, to his own people’s peril.  France, Ireland, and Scotland remained Catholic. (England was Catholic up until the Catholic Church’s policy on divorce became an inconvenience to King Henry VIII.)

King Henry VIII of England used the conflict to divorce his Catholic wife, in favor of his ill-fated young protestant mistress.  John Wycliffe and John Calvin became household names in England, though while Wycliffe’s name remains untarnished, Calvin’s puritan movement, supported by the Crown, began to mercilessly purge all Catholic Churches of treasure and “pomp and circumstance.”  They also began to purge England and Ireland of Catholics and Irish-(a war that continues to a minor extent today).  Many pacifist Protestants, exiled puritans, and Irish sought safe harborage in other nations and colonies. 
               
The relative independence experienced by colonists allowed Christians of various "flavors" to flourish.  In the English colonies, unity was essential for survival.  Religious tolerance existed because the early colonists were too busy fighting starvation and the elements to fight each other.  Though there was a certain amount of tension between the various Protestant groups and Catholics, rarely, if ever, resulted in bloodshed.  Protestant groups that shared a mutual understandings of scripture, conducted regular devotionals and Bible studies.  Though all held the same core beliefs, some focused more on one aspect of Christ and his teachings than another. 

Denominations eventually developed into organized faith branches:  Those that were drawn more to doctrine and tradition than on matters of the Spirit would attend an Episcopalian church.  Those focused on the methods of the Spirit would attend a Methodist church, so on and so forth. Protestantism’s greatest strength is its absence of uniformity, in practice but not in core doctrine.  A true protestant believes that anyone who accepts Christ as savior, repents of sin (Sin, being clearly defined in scripture), and agrees to try to live as Christ lived is a Christian brother and a fellow soldier in the war against evil. 

 I say true Protestants because hard line Puritan-Calvinist/Anabaptists, often defined sin according to their own twisted/flawed, extra-biblical interpretations.  Some of those “sins” remain in most Church doctrine found in the United States because the United States of America was the first Protestant state built on protestant principles.  Protestant principles are all basically the same and have not changed since the founding of this nation:  God’s grace and hard work, which are synonymous with liberty, and capitalism, *if that doesn't describe American culture, then not only were our founder's deists, but they were also monkeys' uncles!      

One of the biggest difference between the high church Christians and the Non-Anglican/Presbyterian, Protestant Church is that Church attendance and clerical leadership is recommended, but not required for salvation. Jesus told us to go out unto all the world, not go unto the temple once a week.  Church is to be used to provide education and support, the mission is given to ALL and is outside of the church walls.   Again Protestantism varies wildly, so this is a historically based generalization.   

(*Many modern Catholic, Anglican/Presbyterian Churches also share this view, it varies according to the pastor.   I’ve heard of modern Lutheran ministers for instance, that were quicker to denounce a Baptist as a heretic, than a Renascence Bishop would denounce a Cathar!)





 Exactly what constitutes as sin is often a point of contention in Protestantism, as it was in the early church. *Read the New Testament!  The advantage of High Churches, is that the Archbishop or Pope is permitted to interpret what scripture says, resulting in a uniform understanding of expectations and a clear moral code.  Protestantism’s lack of centralized power allows for a certain amount of individual interpretation, which has been problematic, to say the least.  I will list a few of the most common sins, with a brief explanation: * the following moral standard is also held by those that are considered false witnesses by the Church, such as Mormons, Jehovah’s Witnesses, & etc.
 
     Lie: Honesty is the best policy
     Murder: To end the life of anyone made in the image of God, (Mankind).  If it has a heartbeat, it is alive and should remain so.
 (Self-defense does not = murder, it is a prevention of it.)
     Blaspheme: To do or say anything contrary to Christ, especially espousing it as truth.
     Curse: To call forth evil wrath (Satan) onto someone, finding pleasure in the thought of that person’s damnation.
     False witness: To claim to be teaching Christ’s message and philosophy but actually teaching Man’s/Satan’s or otherwise lead the faithful into sin.  (Some cultures, mainly the U.S., put the use of tobacco and alcohol in this category, though drunkenness is universally condemned.)
     Pride: To live according to your own will and self-righteousness, never humbling yourself to God.
     Idolatry: Putting anything as priority above God or even at his level. (Man, animal, object, or activity.)
     Lust (covetous behavior): We all have desires, but those desires become sin when they lead us to hurt others, or when coming to the place in our hearts where we would, out of our own selfishness, be willing that others should suffer.
     Adultery: Christian marriage is a covenant designed to mirror the relationship between Christ and the Church, thus it is an eternal institution between two people and God.  Covenants are not contracts.  Though the Israelites violated God’s covenant, it never ended and they remain God’s people.  Though we sin, God takes us back. *Read Hosea

*For more information on the reformation, and understanding the fears, and actions of those living through it, I recommend Dan Carlin’s podcast on the events that transpired in Post-Catholic Munster (Germany): http://www.dancarlin.com/product/hardcore-history-48-prophets-of-doom/

No comments:

Post a Comment